CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
14 Jul 2025
ESG is an acronym that refers to the three fundamental pillars of corporate conduct assessment: environmental social and governance. It is a non-financial framework that measures companies’ responsibility and sustainability in these three areas.
Understanding what is ESG means recognizing the importance of these parameters in guiding decisions, assessing long-term risks, and establishing a trust relationship with stakeholders.
Globally, ESG has taken center stage in shaping corporate reputation and compliance with emerging regulations, directly influencing access to capital and the ability to operate on international markets.
The following article will explore the principles underlying ESG and the increasingly significant impact of this approach on global business strategy.
To fully understand the ESG approach, it is necessary to analyze its three elements separately.
Together, these three pillars form a helpful assessment framework for analyzing corporate conduct in terms of resilience to non-financial risks and responsibility towards all stakeholders (learn more what is corporate governance), providing insights into long-term sustainability.
When we discuss what is ESG in business, we refer to how a company takes environmental, social, and governance criteria into account in its business strategy and operations. Companies following ESG principles seek to find risks and opportunities that a company wouldn’t typically notice on its financial statements.
The company could have sustainability goals and targets, such as achieving carbon neutrality, for example. It could also consider ethical sourcing and may even look at making the board of directors more independent and professional so they can set a tone for the organization and enhance overall sustainability practices.
ESG dates back to the 1960s when ethical investment movements became more prevalent. During this time, the conversation was about socially responsible investors choosing to exclude certain sectors of the economy (like tobacco or arms) from their investments.
Quick forward to today, the focus has become a framework for a more structured and measurable approach to responsible investing. The introduction of the UN’s Principles of Responsible Investment (PRI) in 2006 provided a framework, enabling institutions and institutional investors to adopt accountable practices and engage with ESG as a structure for investment management decision-makers.
Over the last couple of years, this concept has converged further with the emergence of standards, like GRI and TCFD for reporting, and increased scrutiny by regulators.
ESG and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) are similar concepts with very different meanings and approaches. In general, CSR is a voluntary process where companies endeavor to contribute to society positively—whether through financial donations, a community project or ethical practices—to gain a better reputation.
ESG is a structured framework for companies to formalize corporate responsibility into decision-making utilizing evidence-based data. ESG does not only represent reputation, but it informs risk assessment, regulatory compliance, and investor interest.
In summary, CSR represents what a company chooses to do out of moral responsibility, while ESG represents what it must do to demonstrate long-term strength and reliability.
ESG measurement and reporting are based on internationally recognized standards created to provide consistency, transparency, and comparability between companies. The main references include:
In addition to reports produced internally by companies, numerous ESG rating agencies—such as MSCI and Sustainalytics—analyze company performance using proprietary criteria, creating ESG reporting and insights consulted by investors and stakeholders. However, the absence of universal standards can lead to score inconsistencies and leave room for phenomena such as greenwashing.
Incorporating ESG criteria into corporate governance demonstrates a progression in the meaning of corporate leadership. Governance stewardship is no longer based solely on financial metrics but also includes measures of environmental, social, and governance responsibility.
Boards of directors must supervise many ESG policies by relying on dedicated committees (what is an audit committee?) or executives with defined duties. A methodology like this will allow ESG priorities to be integrated into internal controls, risk management, and decision-making.
ESG investing has experienced an accelerated growth rate in recent years. Investors, consumers, and regulators are changing the conversation.
Investors have moved beyond simply pursuing financial returns; they expect transparency and accountability on environmental social and corporate governance issues. The statistics suggest a rising trend in capital allocated to ESG, as well as a growing focus on firms that have initiated credible sustainability updates.
This external pressure is certainly affecting operational practices within firms, as many ESG reporting companies are trying to become more ‘ESG-oriented’ in order to help maintain their overall market confidence and generate meaningful insights for investors.
Integrating ESG into business strategies can provide real and sustainable benefits.
The adoption of ESG practices is thus not only reacting to external pressure but taking a chance to optimize shared value.
While the ESG model continues to grow and thrive, challenges and hurdles still exist.
Challenges are evident, however, many companies prove that it is possible to pursue societal good and competitiveness given they align and are disclosed.
Regulatory progress and ongoing developments in reporting globally are shifting ESG from a voluntary to a mandatory commitment. For example, companies in Europe are now required to report on multiple facets of their environmental as well as their social performance by reporting on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
In the U.S., the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed rules that require listed companies to disclose climate risk and greenhouse gas emissions.
Finally, there is a growing appetite in the Asia-Pacific region as well, as regulations evolve in Japan, Singapore, and South Korea.
To successfully implement ESG, businesses need to complete a materiality analysis to understand the relevant environmental, social, and governance issues for stakeholders and industries. So, engagement with stakeholders is a necessary first step to understand priority levels.
At the appropriate time, sound internal policies are created and aligned within a governance structure. The information is organized to track progress, and management is responsible for taking action where necessary.
ESG are the environmental, social, and governance factors that guide a company’s management operations.
ESG serves to align business practices with stakeholder values by identifying any sustainability risks that affect financial performance and reputation.
Management is one of the three pillars of ESG. It ensures accountability, ethical decision-making, and oversight of sustainability goals.
ESG standards are developed by global frameworks, such as GRI, SASB, and TCFD, and are influenced by regional regulators.
In many countries, yes. ESG is becoming increasingly mandatory, particularly for listed companies and those operating in regulated sectors.
Deloitte. (2018). Audit Committee Resource Guide. Deloitte Development LLC https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/center-for-corporate-governance/us-aers-audit-committee-resource-guide-2018-041818.pdf
KPMG. (2021). Audit Committee Guide. KPMG International. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/id/pdf/2021/11/kpmg-audit-committee-guide.pdf
PwC. (s.d.). Audit committee responsibilities. PwC Governance Insights Center. https://www.pwc.com/us/en/services/governance-insights-center/library/audit-committee-responsibilities.html
Venture Capital
14 July 2025
Startups are often looking for capital to grow and expand. However, the way they approach financing can vary greatly: venture capital and venture debt represent two very different paths. This guide maps out the fundamental contrasts: how each works, where they typically apply, and what they mean for control, growth, and risk. It’s written for […]
Business Consulting
26 May 2025
Transfer pricing defines the price at which a multinational company (MNE) exchanges goods, services or intellectual property between two internal entities in different countries. In short, this practice allows companies to exchange internally while respecting price standards. In fact, each country has different tax regulations that affect declared income. For example, setting a price too […]
Business Consulting
14 July 2025
Supplier diversity is a practice that involves companies intentionally cultivating supply chains that include businesses owned by historically underrepresented groups. This can include a range of demographic groups, including businesses owned by women, racial and ethnic minorities, veterans, LGBTQ+ individuals, and those living with disabilities. This is a vital contributor to a more equitable business […]