CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
14 Jul 2025
What is corporate governance? In simple terms, it is the system of rules, protocols, practices, and processes that control a company. It is instrumental in directing the relationships between a corporation’s management, board, and shareholders. No matter how large or small a company, governance is vital. This isn’t a concept that is limited to certain jurisdictions, either—it applies globally.
Given the importance of corporate governance, it’s well worth gaining a solid understanding of it. That’s why we’ve created this article exploring the key models, examples, and frameworks that shape and support corporations worldwide.
Corporate governance is the system by which companies and their operations are directed and controlled. This system guides how decisions are made and which parties in the company hold certain types of responsibility. Alongside this, clear accountability mechanisms identify and address issues in effective and ethical ways. Governance also tends to influence how key company objectives are set and monitored.
One of the most important aspects of corporate governance is that it balances the interests of the various parties that influence a business. Whether shareholders, board members, executives, front-line staff, or other stakeholders, checks put in place by corporate governance serve to keep all parties’ interests aligned.
Approaches, motivations, and protocols for governance can vary, particularly between private and public companies. Private companies tend to have greater flexibility in their structure and application. On the other hand, when we’re exploring the question of what is a government corporation, it is clear that public entities must meet strict regulatory requirements related to reporting and accountability that directly influence corporate governance.
Clear guiding principles of corporate governance drive effective systems. While the details can vary between companies, industries, and structures, there are core foundational elements that are common. These are:
Good corporate governance is influenced by well-defined distributions of power and responsibility within the organization. As a result, there are various governance structures in place, including:
Governance approaches can vary depending on the structure of the organization or its location. The Anglo-American model used through the U.K., U.S., Canada, and Australia is shareholder-centric, prioritizing shareholder value and safeguarding investor rights.
The Continental European model, on the other hand, is stakeholder-oriented. Corporations in countries like Germany, France, and the Netherlands place greater emphasis on the needs of employees, banks, and other parties other than shareholders.
With the Japanese model of corporate governance, building and maintaining long-term relationships is prioritized. This is achieved through developing conglomerations of networked business partners known as keiretsu alongside large shareholder blocks and company-aligned banks. The result is often greater stability, which also serves prioritization of lifetime employment.
Additionally, family-owned business governance is common in emerging markets and private conglomerations. Enterprises in these spaces adopt mechanisms that help them navigate their unique challenges, such as planning succession, maintaining the independence of their boards, and balancing necessary transparency with traditions.
When trying to understand corporate governance, it can be useful to look at key examples in which it has succeeded or failed.
For instance, the Volkswagen emissions scandal of 2015 is an example of shortcomings in supervisory board oversight. The company equipped tested vehicles with emissions monitors that falsified data to appear compliant, leading to lawsuits, prison sentences for some former executives, and loss of public trust.
Meanwhile, Enron is one of the most noteworthy cases of failed corporate governance. Inadequate oversight processes and lack of transparency resulted in unethical accounting practices and a prevalence of conflict-of-interest decision-making, among other issues that led to the corporation’s downfall.
On the other hand, India’s Tata Group continues to maintain a reputation for solid ethical board leadership and a clearly structured operational approach. As a result, it has been instrumental in setting standards for how family-owned enterprises can operate with accountability, transparency, and success.
It’s also worth examining BP’s handling of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. This provides valuable insights into governance under crisis, as the event resulted in scrutiny of the company’s risk management practice, highlighting weaknesses. There were also issues with transparency and accountability throughout stakeholder communications.
The benefits of strong corporate governance tend to center on the following areas:
Alongside its benefits, there are some challenges with corporate governance. Firstly, while board independence can boost objectivity, there’s also the chance it can result in groupthink, particularly where the board is inexperienced. Furthermore, a lack of diversity or global representation in leadership can narrow the board or executive perspectives, weakening governance.
Another common challenge is conflict between the commitment to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) and shareholder returns. What is ESG? It’s the framework that measures and directs a company’s environmental and social impact. In some instances, shareholders may feel these standards sacrifice profitability potential, which is a source of tension.
Finally, regulatory inconsistencies across jurisdictions can result in greater governance complications, particularly for multinationals. Sometimes, excessive regulatory overreach in certain jurisdictions hinders wider innovation or growth.
As the global marketplace becomes more accessible to a wider range of corporations, standards for governance are also adapting. There is an increasing number of cross-border regulations being introduced alongside voluntary global codes of conduct that companies are encouraged to adopt. This includes initiatives such as the OECD corporate governance principles and the IFRS financial and sustainability reporting standards that help harmonize operations internationally.
There is also greater attention both from the public and authorities globally on metrics related to ESG and how corporations are performing in those areas. This is supported by ongoing digital transformation that increases data transparency and makes real-time transparency and accountability practical.
It creates a clear structure for strategic direction, ethical leadership, and oversight. As a result, business practices can be better aligned with stakeholder expectations and legal obligations.
In government corporations, public policy objectives are combined with commercial activities, which requires greater oversight mechanisms for robust public sector accountability.
Small businesses
Yes, startups can and should adopt corporate governance principles. Even small businesses benefit from establishing clear decision-making processes, defining leadership roles, and embedding ethical values into their operations from the outset.
ESG considerations are becoming central to governance frameworks. They reflect a company’s environmental impact, social practices, and governance integrity, all of which are increasingly important to investors, regulators, and consumers in evaluating long-term value and risk.
The board of directors bears primary responsibility for enforcing governance policies, but it is supported by compliance officers, shareholders, auditors, and regulators. Together, these groups ensure that governance standards are followed and that the company operates in a transparent, lawful, and ethical manner.
OECD. (2025, May 5).Corporate governance. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/policy-issues/corporate-governance.html
IFRS. (2025). S1 General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information. IFRS. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s1-general-requirements/
Cheffins, B, et al. (2025, April 3). Deconstructing the “Anglo-American” Corporate Model. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance. https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/04/03/deconstructing-the-anglo-american-corporate-model/
Private Equity
14 July 2025
In the life cycle of a private equity investment, the moment of exit is a critical phase since the choice of the disinvestment strategy affects not only the financial return but also the reputation of the fund and investor confidence. Understanding the options available is essential for fund managers, entrepreneurs, and advisors involved in medium […]
Individual Relocation Consulting
28 August 2025
Temporary housing generally refers to a short-term living arrangement that is intended to act as a stop-gap between permanent residences or while navigating transitional life stages. There are various contexts this applies to, such as when undergoing a corporate relocation—particularly when navigating the challenges of moving to a new country—or when managing property renovations. Contrary […]
Nominee Services
26 May 2025
In a corporate context, understanding beneficial ownership vs. legal ownership is essential to distinguish between who benefits from an asset and who legally owns it. Tax planning and privacy reasons often separate the two types of ownership. In practice, a distinction is made between the person who actually owns an asset (beneficial) and the person […]