PRIVATE EQUITY
14 Jul 2025
Private equity and venture capital are among the most influential funding models in the current financial landscape, with both being focused on private companies. They’re channels that help businesses grow, restructure, and scale, while providing potentially reliable returns to investors. Yet, despite their common capital provision focus, they differ significantly. Their strategic approaches, company stage engagement, risk profiles, and structures are distinct from one another.
Each of these investment models can be powerful tools when managed from a place of solid knowledge, much like when considering hedge fund vs private equity potential. We’ve put together this article to provide a side-by-side breakdown for those needing to gain a more thorough understanding of how each model functions, its uses, and its challenges. Given that both are part of the worldwide financial landscape, this guide also provides a global overview, rather than being region-specific, to give potential investors the most relevant insights.
When asking “What is private equity vs venture capital?”, the first thing to understand is that private equity (PE) revolves around investments that are focused on applying capital to mature companies that are often underperforming. These investments will be focused on improving operations in ways that boost the value of the business before the company is resold at a profit.
In most cases, PE investment firms will seek to acquire either majority stakes or full ownership of a target business. This provides the level of management control that enables firms to make the often significant changes required to meaningfully boost efficiency and overall profitability.
Typically, PE funds are structured as limited partnerships designed to hold investments for long periods, as growing a company’s value in a meaningful and sustainable way is a long-term project. Private equity consulting firms often assist strategically here. Funds will generally hold an investment for between five to ten years. At the point of target performance or optimum market conditions, funds will utilize exit strategies such as selling to another company, dividend recapitalization, or initial public offering (IPO). The return is then divided among the fund’s partners.
Venture capital (VC) is an investment approach that focuses on providing early-stage funding to startups that investors consider to have significant potential for growth. The priority is often young companies intending to introduce innovative concepts, scalable products, and engaging brands to the market. This is reflected by the sectors that typically attract VC funding, such as technology, biotech, and fintech, among other innovators. While the nature of these startups is often considered too high risk for many traditional funding providers, VC investors provide capital with the expectation that this risk is balanced by the potential for high-reward outcomes.
Venture capitalists don’t tend to seek full control of startups. Rather, they often take minority stakes with the expectation of preferred shares and seats on the board that allow them to influence strategy. Funding is also provided in rounds—seed, series A, B, C, and so forth—with injections of capital upon reaching specific growth milestones.
While PE and VC both involve private investment, there are key differences between the two to be mindful of. These are:
Both types of funds use the limited partnership-general partner (LP-GP) structure model. In these structures, general partners (GPs) will actively manage the fund, representing the interests of limited partners (LPs) who take a passive role and simply provide the majority of capital. Both also attract a range of typical LPs, including institutional investors such as pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, university endowments, and family offices.
That said, there are nuances in structure and operation. PE funds are usually larger to account for the significant operational changes that require funding, with investment being applied to relatively few companies. VC funds, while involving smaller levels of capital, are often more diversely distributed, spreading investment across many startups in efforts to balance risk. In terms of fees, both tend to follow the 2/20 model—2% management fees, 20% performance fees—though PE funds can also feature additional monitoring and transaction fees.
Exit strategies for both types of funds have areas of both similarity and difference. Both PE and VC firms utilize initial public offerings (IPOs) as opportunities to acquire returns on their investments.
However, PE also utilizes company sales, secondary buyouts to other PE firms, and dividend recapitalizations, as these exit methods best suit the aim of maximizing returns from a majority stake. This exit will usually occur after several years of steadily raising valuation based on metrics like Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA).
VC firms, on the other hand, often rely more on acquisition by a larger firm alongside IPOs for exit routes. The timing of this can depend on a range of external factors, including market sentiment and the competitive landscape, with valuation at exit usually based on predictive factors such as user growth and market potential.
The regulatory landscape for PE and VC funds can vary across markets, but both are subject to oversight intended to ensure transparency and maintain investor protections. PE funds are usually large and exert significant control over portfolio companies, which usually means they face scrutiny around antitrust issues, labor law compliance, and financial reporting. It’s well worth also exploring what does a private equity lawyer do, for insights into the complexities here. VC funds are usually subject to lighter regulations, largely being required to comply with reporting standards, fiduciary responsibility frameworks, and investor rights safeguards.
Both commonly make use of certain jurisdictions to domicile funds to better navigate regulatory elements. Luxembourg, the Cayman Islands, and Delaware in the U.S., all offer favorable tax environments and regulations that support innovation.
Both PE and VC funds are seeing greater interest globally, as there are rising trends for engagement in alternative assets rather than public market investments. Investors are finding significant opportunities in emerging PE and VC markets that fund core infrastructure, particularly in technology, healthcare, and financial service environments. There’s also greater cross-border deal flow, diversifying portfolios and tapping into previously underexplored areas of growth.
Alongside these trends, there’s increasing application of technology. Digital tools such as artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, and cloud platforms are contributing to due diligence streamlining, improving accuracy in target identification, and boosting transparency.
Choosing the right model really comes down to the goals of entrepreneurs and investors—in particular their business stage interests, capital requirements, and long-term economic objectives. VC funds can be ideal for engaging with early-stage startups, particularly when investors prioritize shorter exit windows and are comfortable balancing the high risks with the potential for high returns. PE is likely to be more appropriate for those willing to commit significant capital over long periods, in exchange for potential stability and predictable outcomes.
In some instances, the either-or choice isn’t necessary. More firms are starting to operate hybrid models or evolve from VC to PE over time. This can help investors engage with more diverse opportunities.
Private equity focuses on acquiring mature companies while venture capital funds early-stage startups.
Venture capital tends to carry higher risk due to the early-stage investment focus.
Yes, an increasing number of firms operate across both domains through different fund vehicles.
They both use limited partnership structures, though they differ in fund terms and investment timelines.
Venture capital can deliver high returns, but experience higher volatility. Private equity tends to offer steadier returns over time.
Private equity firms prioritize established or mature businesses, while venture capitalists seek high-growth startups.
Gibson, J. (2025, April 10). Limited Partnership (LP): What It Is, Pros and Cons, How to Form One. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/limitedpartnership.asp
NASDAQ. (2025). Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). NASDAQ. https://www.nasdaq.com/glossary/e/earnings-before-interest-taxes-depreciation-and-amortization
United States Private Equity Council. (2025, February 24). AI-Driven Value Creation in Private Equity Fund Management. USPEC. https://www.uspec.org/blog/ai-driven-value-creation-in-private-equity-fund-management
Venture Capital
14 July 2025
Establishing how to obtain venture capital funding empowers startups and early-stage businesses to get the resources they need to grow. This is the process of securing private investment from VC firms or investors in exchange for equity. We’ve put together this guide to help entrepreneurs seeking external funding navigate the process, providing practical steps all […]
Private Equity
14 July 2025
For entrepreneurs who would prefer to share ownership and responsibilities of businesses, partnerships are a common structure. Yet, there is more than one approach to this practice. It’s important to understand the distinction between general partner vs limited partner models before jumping into formation. We’ve created this article to provide entrepreneurs with insights into the […]
Business Formation
27 May 2025
Expanding a business today goes beyond increasing sales or opening more stores. It means adapting to various cultures, integrating updated processes, and adapting to evolving technology. That’s why having a clear growth plan that minimizes mistakes and gives the business a long-term vision is critical. Ascot International services can help you by creating business interconnect […]