MERGER AND ACQUISITION
26 May 2025
Corporate mergers are the union of two separate companies into a single legal entity. The purposes can be many, and they have a substantial financial and equity impact on shareholders—influencing ownership, governance, and corporate rights significantly. In this article we will analyze how does a merger affect shareholders before, during, and after the merger. The content is aimed at international contexts, not confined to a single area or jurisdiction.
Mergers are transactions in which two companies combine to form a single entity. Unlike an acquisition, where one company absorbs another, a merger tends to be presented as a union of equals, although in practice one of the two companies often assumes operational control.
There are different M&A negotiation strategies, but the reasons for mergers typically include expansion, cost reduction, increasing market share, or seeking new synergies. Shareholders, as partial company owners, are directly affected by these decisions. They are officially informed through corporate communications or meetings and, in many jurisdictions, have the right to vote on merger approval.
As soon as a merger is announced, stock prices vary quickly. Usually the target company’s shares increase in price—considering the price offered in the deal—while those of the acquiring company vary depending on the perception of the deal.
However, the market may react with high volatility due to the uncertainty—for example, raising doubts about the companies’ financial strength, cultural integration, regulatory approvals, etc.—and by its complexity. Several factors influence the impact of merger and acquisition on shareholders. The main ones include the transaction structure (cash, loan, hybrid), the deal details, and the target market.
There are various types and M&A process steps, and each has a different impact on owners. The three main types are:
Relying on merger and acquisition lawyers can help companies make the right decision.
In many jurisdictions, stockholders must cast a formal vote to approve a merger. Merger shareholder approval requirements may vary according to corporate structure and local regulations, but a qualified majority—such as 66% or 75% of the votes—is often required. Ordinary shareholders have the right to be informed and participate in the vote, while in some special cases voting may be available only to certain groups of investors, such as those holding preferred stock.
M&A transactions have a significant financial effect on stockholders. In fact, depending on the deal, they may receive cash, stock, or a mixture of both. Cash payments usually represent a permanent exit from the company, whereas stock payments allow an active role in the company.
In the case of cash payments, investors’ earnings are immediately taxed; if, on the other hand, compensation is in equity, taxation may be deferred until the subsequent transfer of the acquired shares.
Finally, it should be remembered that the percentage of ownership can significantly change following a merger, affecting the company’s decision-making power.
Once the merger is completed, the original stocks are, as a rule, cancelled, converted, or redeemed. Stockholders can receive shares in the merged company, obtain cash compensation from investors, or get restructured or revalued shares.
Obviously holding stock in a newly formed company can give great opportunities for growth and unexpected gains but also big risks related to initial instability—such as investment instability, uncertainty in the market, operational and management difficulties, etc.
Like all complex operations, mergers have benefits and risks for each member. Among the main benefits:
As for risks, however:
A merger will also impact the company’s dividends and profits. In fact, in the short term, any investment will be directed toward the integration of the companies and their development. The impact on EPS depends on the merger structure. If the transaction is accretive, the combined group’s EPS increases. Conversely, EPS may initially fall in a dilutive merger, especially if the acquisition is financed by stock issues or expensive debt.
On the other hand, however, in the medium to long term due to an improved cost structure and greater synergies, dividends and EPS may grow.
Minority shareholders hold a small share of capital and do not exercise control over company decisions. Following a merger, they are exposed to certain risks, the main ones being:
To protect themselves, however, they can use some tools such as the right of objection, requesting independent valuations, or exercising legal action in cases of majority abuse.
After a merger, stock can follow different paths such as share conversion in case these are converted (at a predetermined exchange ratio) into the merged company’s stock. Other options are cash out (obligation to liquidate one’s shares) and mixed instruments.
In many cases, yes. If you receive a gain on the value of the stock, you may be subject to capital gains taxes, depending on your country’s tax laws.
Yes, but only if they hold a sufficient percentage of votes against or if they can prove that the merger is harmful or illegitimate.
There is no predetermined time, but usually 3 to 12 months. It depends on the complexity of the deal and the subsequent implications.
No. Company’s ownership can change form, but shareholders retain a stake in the merged company unless they are liquidated or bought out.
Rani, N., Yadav, S. S., & Jain, P. K. (2015). Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions on Shareholders’ Wealth in Short-Run: An Event Study Approach. Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 40(3), 293–312.
Ohrn, E., & Seegert, N. (2019). The Impact of Investor-Level Taxation on Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Public Economics, 172, 1–14.
https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pubeco/v177y2019ic1.html
Becht, M., Polo, A., & Rossi, S. (2016). Does Mandatory Shareholder Voting Prevent Bad Acquisitions?. Review of Financial Studies, 29(11), 3035–3067.
https://academic.oup.com/rfs/article-abstract/29/11/3035/2583672
Tax Consulting
14 July 2025
A holding company is a legal entity that exists primarily to own shares in other companies—it doesn’t manufacture products or provide services directly. This article looks at the holding company tax benefits that make such setups appealing, especially for international entrepreneurs, corporate groups, and high-net-worth individuals. From income tax efficiency and asset protection to intellectual […]
Legal And Compliance
26 May 2025
Policies and procedures are the foundational documents that influence day-to-day business functions. They keep staff behavior, legal compliance, and internal governance consistent within the company. It’s important to understand that while these internal rulebooks support consistency, they still need to evolve over time. Legal, operational, and risk environments change—particularly for globally operating organizations—requiring relevant policy […]
Tax Consulting
14 July 2025
International tax planning refers to how a business structures its cross-border financial activities to efficiently comply with legal tax obligations. This involves a range of measures, including operational structuring, income distribution, and careful jurisdiction selection to mitigate double taxation and improve global tax compliance. We’ve created this article to provide insights into planning strategies. By […]