TAX CONSULTING
1 Nov 2025
The global minimum corporate tax rate is one of the most significant international tax reforms in modern history, representing a major effort to create a fairer and more transparent global tax system. Spearheaded by the OECD and supported by G20 nations, this initiative is designed to prevent multinational corporations from shifting profits to low-tax jurisdictions, which has long contributed to imbalances in global tax revenue. By establishing a 15 percent minimum effective corporate tax rate, the reform aims to ensure fair competition among businesses and promote consistent revenue collection across countries. The policy affects companies of all sizes that operate internationally, from large multinationals to growing enterprises planning global expansion. Ascot provides guidance on navigating these changes on a global scale, helping businesses remain compliant and strategically prepared no matter where they operate. This article explores what the reform means for corporations, how the rules work in practice, and the steps businesses should take to assess their exposure, update tax strategies, and implement the necessary systems and processes to comply with the new standards. It also highlights how adopting modern compliance tools and forward-looking planning can help companies turn these regulatory changes into an opportunity for improved efficiency and long-term growth.
The term global minimum corporate tax rate sets a baseline effective tax rate of 15 percent for large multinational companies. This reform is part of the OECD’s “Pillar Two” framework under the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiative, a coordinated effort involving over 135 countries to address harmful tax practices. The concept of “top-up taxes” allows countries to collect additional tax when profits are reported in lower-tax jurisdictions, ensuring that every jurisdiction where a company operates receives its fair share. This measure aims to create a fairer international tax environment by discouraging profit shifting and tax base erosion, fundamentally changing how multinational enterprises structure their operations.
Many multinational corporations have historically reduced their tax burden by shifting profits to low-tax countries, creating imbalances in global tax revenue. The global corporate minimum tax rate directly addresses this issue. The OECD’s goal is to promote tax fairness, stabilize international revenue, and curb harmful tax competition among nations. More than 135 countries have agreed to adopt the framework, marking a major step in international tax coordination. The policy primarily targets large corporations with annual revenues over €750 million, but its impact extends across the entire global business landscape.
The minimum global corporate tax rate of 15% applies on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis, ensuring that each country where a company operates meets the threshold. Key mechanisms include the Income Inclusion Rule (IIR), which allows the parent company’s country to collect additional tax if subsidiaries pay less than 15 percent, and the Undertaxed Payments Rule (UTPR), which ensures other jurisdictions can collect tax if the IIR does not apply. Countries can also implement a Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax (QDMTT) to retain revenue at home. The goal is consistency, making sure every jurisdiction contributes its fair share and removing the advantage of routing profits through low-tax havens.
Affected companies will need to review their tax strategies, accounting structures, and reporting systems thoroughly. They must identify subsidiaries in jurisdictions where the effective tax rate is below 15 percent and prepare for potential top-up obligations that could significantly change their tax positions. Global data transparency is more important than ever, as regulators require detailed disclosures on income allocation, effective tax rates, and intercompany transactions. The expected increase in compliance workloads means companies will need advanced technology and expert guidance to meet the new standards. Traditional tax planning strategies that focused on low-tax jurisdictions without considering top-up taxes are no longer sufficient.
Although the rules mainly target large multinational companies, medium-sized companies expanding internationally may also be affected indirectly. Subsidiaries or joint ventures under larger global entities could face tax adjustments that impact their financial projections. Companies planning international growth should prepare for the administrative and compliance requirements aligned with the global standard, even if their revenues are currently below the €750 million threshold. Implementing modern compliance tools and strong reporting systems early can help reduce future risks and position businesses for sustainable growth under the new tax rules.
Both governments and corporations face practical and legal challenges during implementation. Different timelines and enforcement rules across jurisdictions add complexity for companies operating in multiple countries. Conflicts may arise between local tax incentives and international obligations, as countries try to attract investment while complying with the global framework. Complex compliance calculations and the need for updated data systems place significant demands on corporate finance and tax teams. Some developing countries worry that the 15 percent minimum could reduce competitiveness or foreign investment, creating political tensions that may affect enforcement. Businesses need to closely track national adoption schedules and transitional guidelines to avoid compliance gaps that could lead to unexpected tax liabilities.
Digital transformation plays an important role in managing complex tax data across jurisdictions. Automated reporting systems and AI in corporate tax analytics can help calculate effective tax rates accurately and flag discrepancies before they become compliance issues. Technologies such as e-invoicing compliance tax systems will be instrumental in adapting to global reforms, ensuring accurate data collection and seamless reporting across borders. Reliable digital infrastructure reduces human error and ensures transparent reporting in line with OECD standards. Companies investing in these technologies now position themselves to handle the increased reporting requirements efficiently while maintaining accuracy in their global tax calculations.
Businesses should take practical steps to prepare for these changes. Conducting a global entity review helps identify exposure to low-tax jurisdictions and highlights areas that need immediate attention. Reassessing transfer pricing policies and tax structures ensures alignment with the new framework and reduces the risk of unexpected top-up taxes. Investing in modern compliance and reporting technology makes it possible to manage the increased data requirements that traditional systems cannot handle efficiently. Working with advisors who specialize in corporate tax compliance services helps interpret cross-border obligations and navigate the complex interplay between different jurisdictions’ implementations.
The new framework may shift global tax revenues, giving developing countries more stability through fairer contributions from multinational corporations. While the reform reduces incentives for profit shifting, it could also raise operational costs for companies that previously relied on tax arbitrage strategies. Governments could use the additional revenue to invest in public infrastructure and economic development, creating long-term benefits beyond tax collection. The overall impact will depend on consistent adoption and enforcement across all participating jurisdictions, as uneven implementation could create new opportunities for tax competition and arbitrage.
The introduction of the global minimum corporate tax rate represents a major step toward greater transparency and cooperation in international taxation. Discussions continue on how digital economy taxes, such as digital services taxes, will fit into future global frameworks. The potential for further alignment of reporting standards and data-sharing agreements among tax authorities suggests that this reform is just the start of a broader transformation. Ongoing collaboration between nations, corporations, and regulators will shape the future of international taxation and could extend to other areas of tax competition and base erosion beyond the current scope of Pillar Two.
It ensures large multinational corporations pay at least a 15% tax rate globally, preventing profit shifting to low-tax jurisdictions and creating a more equitable international tax system.
Many countries began implementing the rules in 2024, with others expected to follow in subsequent years according to their national legislative processes.
Primarily multinational corporations with annual revenues exceeding €750 million, though medium-sized enterprises may be indirectly affected through subsidiaries or joint ventures.
It may increase revenue stability by ensuring fair contributions from multinationals, but could reduce competitiveness for countries previously reliant on low-tax incentives to attract foreign investment.
By reviewing entity structures, updating compliance tools, and consulting with international tax experts to ensure readiness for the new reporting and calculation requirements.
OECD. (2024). Global minimum tax. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/global-minimum-tax.html
Tax Foundation. (2025). Global tax agreement: Details & analysis. https://taxfoundation.org/blog/global-tax-agreement/
Hugger, F., González Cabral, A., Bucci, M., Gesualdo, M., & O’Reilly, P. (2024). The global minimum tax and the taxation of MNE profit. OECD Taxation Working Papers, No. 68.
OECD. (2024). Summary economic impact assessment of the global minimum tax. https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/summary-economic-impact-assessment-global-minimum-tax-january-2024.pdf
World Economic Forum. (2024). A minimum tax rate of 15% on the profits of multinationals. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/02/oecd-minimum-tax-rate/
Business Consulting
14 July 2025
What is a company profit sharing plan? In short, it’s a compensation arrangement that answers the question “What is a profit sharing plan?” by letting an employer carve out a slice of annual earnings and distribute it among employees according to a formula the company controls. Unlike a fixed salary bump, a profit-sharing contribution is […]
Offshore Company
28 August 2025
For founders and CFOs, timing shapes everything from market entry to banking cut-offs. So, how long does it take to register an offshore company? There isn’t a single clock. Timelines shift with jurisdiction, document readiness, and how quickly identity checks clear. Below, you’ll find realistic averages, what usually slows things down, and a step-by-step view […]
Nominee Services
26 May 2025
A nominee shareholder is a person or entity that holds shares in a company, acting explicitly on behalf of the beneficial owner. In most cases, this is a strategy used for legal, administrative, or privacy-related reasons. It’s important to note that it’s a legally recognized activity and it features prominently as part of international business […]



