LEGAL AND COMPLIANCE
26 May 2025
A compliance audit is a formal review of all aspects of an organization that ensures it’s adhering to any laws, regulations, and internal policies that apply. These types of assessments are necessary for a range of sectors, including finance, healthcare, and environmental services, among many others. While for some businesses a voluntary internal audit may be sufficient, for others these checks need to be conducted by a recognized external authority.
Compliance standards don’t just vary by industry, but also by where in the world a company operates. Ascot’s network of experts provides support for global compliance audits, unlike firms that focus on limited jurisdictional audits. As a result, we’ve created this article to help international business leaders to better understand the auditing process, the various types of audits, and what to expect along the way.
Simply put, it is an assessment — usually performed independently — that verifies whether a company is following all applicable legal, ethical, and internal standards.
Compliance audits are distinct from their financial counterparts, which focus entirely on accuracy of accounting practices and financial records. While assessment of financial activities may be involved, these are wider-ranging reviews that evaluate adherence to the full range of regulations and protocols.
The core objective of this type of audit is to ensure ongoing risk mitigation and operational integrity. By getting accurate data on laws and protocols, businesses can avoid costly penalties, operational setbacks, and reputational damage.
There are some significant risks associated with non-compliance. Without alignment to regulations, the consequences can include fines and costly litigation, alongside potential license revocations and reputational damage that disrupts operations.
This is why compliance checks are so important, particularly for enterprises managing operations in multiple jurisdictions and therefore subject to more complex and varied regulations. When conducted regularly and thoroughly, assessments boost transparency, bringing potential areas of risk to light in a timely manner. This supports a company-wide culture of internal discipline and accountability that not only mitigates potential problems but also strengthens global operations.
Compliance audits take a range of forms. The type required can depend on industry, jurisdiction, internal organisation policies, and other factors. The most common are:
While compliance audits vary depending on company needs or legislation, there are certain key elements involved with most. Firstly, document control and recordkeeping will be reviewed, in which auditors examine related policies, historical records, and even the system for documentation retrieval.
Internal reporting mechanisms are usually assessed, too. Elements such as clear processes for reporting and sufficient protections for whistleblowers ensure there are secure ways to raise potential violations.
As employees will be key stakeholders in compliance, examinations to establish whether relevant training programs on regulations are in place are common. There should also be documents that show employees understand and acknowledge their responsibilities. Furthermore, compliance auditors usually assess the protocols a company has in place to update its internal guidelines following legal changes.
Finally, auditors examine leadership’s role in compliance oversight. Whether this is a board of directors or executive team, there must be clarity on each member’s responsibilities alongside their scope for active involvement in and accountability for maintaining certain types of regulatory compliance procedures.
Responsibility for compliance auditing usually depends on the context of the assessment. When reviews are part of a company’s wider governance or risk management practices, then a trained internal auditor who has a deep understanding of the company’s principles and priorities will often undertake the process. In instances when companies want to ensure objectivity and impartiality, compliance reviews tend to be conducted by an external auditor or firm that stakeholders and regulators consider credible. When it comes to mandatory assessments—often as part of enforcement actions or certification procedures—regulatory bodies operated by government or industry-specific authorities will perform the audit.
There are generally four phases in the auditing process.
Effective auditing starts with solid preparation. Businesses need to compile and organize any relevant policy documents, training records, and internal communication protocols. This isn’t only a way to streamline compliance assessment processes, but it also aids transparency that supports thorough audits. It’s also important to designate a key member of staff as a point of contact to both assist auditors and coordinate the flow of documentation. In some instances, it’s wise for businesses to conduct pre-audit evaluations or gap analyses to identify and address any weaknesses prior to the formal review.
Audits aren’t standalone tools—they’re vital components of a company’s ongoing compliance program and governance ecosystem. These assessments provide supporting evidence that the business is actively engaged in staying on top of its legal responsibilities. Performing them regularly also results in up-to-date metrics that validate the program’s efficacy.
Beyond evidence of regulatory commitment, audits are also valuable for informing enterprise risk management (ERM) practices. In essence, audits contribute to feedback loops that influence better strategic decisions and boost accountability, which supports both operational success and stakeholder assurance.
The audit process isn’t necessarily easy, with businesses navigating common challenges. Firstly, inconsistent compliance documentation and missing records can complicate execution, potentially producing inaccurate results. When companies operate in multiple jurisdictions, varying global regulations may create conflicting standards or regulatory overlap that confuses matters.
Poor preparation due to a lack of audit readiness culture or insufficient internal training can create hurdles to a regular and thorough assessment program, too. Furthermore, when companies are over reliant on outdated policies or software, it can inhibit the company’s ability to maintain real-time and relevant compliance.
These challenges make it all the more important to commit to a culture of auditing, informed by experts with experience in both global and local compliance practices.
It’s a formal review that assesses the organization’s alignment with relevant local and international laws and regulations, alongside internal policies.
Auditing can be performed by internal teams, independent external consultants, or official regulatory and government authorities. This depends on the type of audit and its objectives.
Compliance checks should be performed at least annually. Organizations navigating high regulatory risks or subject to industry mandates may require them more frequently.
Sectors such as finance, healthcare, manufacturing, logistics, or those subject to international exposure and licensing requirements.
Organizations will receive a full report outlining the auditor’s findings. They’ll need to address and correct any non-conformities.
European Commission. (2024). Auditing of companies’ financial statements. Europa.eu. https://finance.ec.europa.eu/capital-markets-union-and-financial-markets/company-reporting-and-auditing/auditing-companies-financial-statements_en
FATF. (2024). FATF Recommendations. FATF. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/topics/fatf-recommendations.html
Hayes, A. (2025, April 10). Enterprise Risk Management (ERM): What It Is and How It Works. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/enterprise-risk-management.asp
Tax Consulting
14 July 2025
Tax arbitrage is simply a legal strategy that allows companies to exploit differences between tax systems, rates, or classifications in different jurisdictions to reduce their overall tax burden. Corps structure their operations to minimize their effective tax burden by taking advantage of different systems of treating income. This article looks at how tax arbitrage really […]
Offshore Company
29 August 2025
The simple answer to the question, “Can offshore companies own intellectual property?”, is yes. In a large number of jurisdictions, it is perfectly legal to assign ownership of intellectual property (IP) to a business registered abroad. Indeed, this is a common setup that is often used in international structuring, with the express intention of leveraging […]
Offshore Company
28 August 2025
An offshore company is a legal entity that is incorporated in a jurisdiction outside of that in which its owners officially reside. These are typically set up by high-net-worth entrepreneurs, global investors, multinational groups, and family offices for a range of reasons. Achieving the goals of offshoring requires companies to be set up correctly. This […]